خط مشی دسترسیدرباره ما
ثبت نامثبت نام
راهنماراهنما
فارسی
ورودورود
صفحه اصلیصفحه اصلی
جستجوی مدارک
تمام متن
منابع دیجیتالی
رکورد قبلیرکورد بعدی
center : Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
Document Type : Latin Dissertation
Language of Document : English
Record Number : 103375
Doc. No : T14937
Call number : ‭WJ,342,A658c,2014‬
Main Entry : Arabmomeni, Morteza
Title & Author : Comparison between theophyllin and N-acetylcysteineand their combination for the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy/مرتضی عرب مومنی
College : Schools, Medical
Date : , 2014
Degree : Cardiology, Specialty
Page No : 18 p.: tab
Note : This thesis is a research project with project ID: 392300
Abstract : Few studies compared the efficacy of theophylline with N-acetylcysteine or evaluated the efficacy of combination therapy in the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN). We compared the efficacy of theophylline, N-acetylcysteine, and combination of these agents in the prevention of CIN.This randomized controlled trial was conducted on 96 patients referring consecutively to the Shahid Chamran University Hospital in Isfahan, Iran for elective coronary angiography (with our without angioplasty). Patients with at least moderate risk for CIN were included and were randomized to receive theophylline (200 mg), N-acetylcysteine (600 mg), or theophylline+N-acetylcysteine, twice daily, from 24 hours before to 48 hours after administration of the contrast material. A non-ionic contrast material with low contrast osmolality was used. Serum creatinine was measured before and 48 hours after contrast material injection. Serum creatinine was increased by 6.83+/-15.32 with theophylline, 13.09+/-14.63 with N-acetylcysteine, and 5.45+/-13.96 with theophylline+N-acetylcysteine after contrast material injection. Controlling for Mehran risk score, baseline serum creatinine concentration, and contrast volume used, the change in serum creatinine level was lower with theophylline compared with N-acetylcysteine (F=4.79, P=0.033), and with theophylline+N-acetylcysteine compared with N-acetylcysteine (F=5.78, P=0.020). CIN (increase in creatinine of >=0.5 mg/dL or >=25 from the baseline) was occurred in 20 , 21.9 , and 7.1 of patients in the theophylline, N-acetylcysteine, and theophylline+N-acetylcysteine groups, respectively (P=0.260). Theophylline is superior to N-acetylcysteine in preventing contrast-induced renal dysfunction. The combination of theophylline and N-acetylcysteine is superior to N-acetylcysteine alone, but not theophylline alone in this regard. Further trials with larger sample of patients are warranted (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02088502).
Descriptor : 1. Acute Kidney Injury.- Descriptors: Acute Kidney Injury
: Theophylline
: Acetylcysteine
: Coronary Angiography
: Contrast Media
Added Entry : Abdar Isfahani, Morteza, Supervisor
: Najafian, Jamshid, Supervisor
Translated Title Supplied by Cataloguer : بررسی اثر مقایسه ای تئوفیلین، ‭-N‬ استیل سیستئین و تئوفیلین + ‭-N‬ استیل سیستئین در پیشگیری از نفروپاتی ناشی از کنتراست در بیماران با ریسک متوسط به بالا
عنوان :
نام فایل :
نوع عام محتوا :
نوع ماده :
فرمت :
سایز :
عرض :
طول :
Comparison between theophyllin and N-acetylcysteineand th...
morteza arab momeni.pdf
پایان نامه لاتین
متن
application/pdf
706 KB
85
85