|
" Comparative study after hamstring ACL Reconstruction with Endobutton and Rigidfix: A clinical trial study "
/ Abdellah Maleki
; Hamid Mousavi
| center
|
:
|
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
|
| Document Type
|
:
|
Latin Dissertation
|
| Language of Document
|
:
|
English
|
| Record Number
|
:
|
106243
|
| Doc. No
|
:
|
T16461
|
| Call number
|
:
|
WE870,M245c,2015
|
| Main Entry
|
:
|
Maleki, Abdellah
|
| Title & Author
|
:
|
Comparative study after hamstring ACL Reconstruction with Endobutton and Rigidfix: A clinical trial study/ Abdellah Maleki
|
| College
|
:
|
Schools, Medical
|
| Date
|
:
|
, 2015
|
| Degree
|
:
|
Orthopedic, Speciality
|
| Page No
|
:
|
21p.: ill, tab
|
| Note
|
:
|
This is a research dissertation with project ID: 391348
|
|
|
:
|
عبدالله مالکی
|
| Abstract
|
:
|
Background: One of the most common orthopedic clinic visits involves direct and indirect knee trauma leading to rupture of anterior cruciate ligament(ACL). Also there are numerous methods proposed so far for reconstruction of ACL. Endobutton and Rigidfix are most frequent methods that used by orthopedic surgeons. Thus the aim of this study wascompare the clinical results of reconstructing arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament of the knee through two methods namely Rigidfix and Endobutton.Materials and methods: in a clinical trial study, a total of 40 patients with rupture of anterior cruciate ligament were selected and randomly divided into two groups. The two groups were treated through fixation procedures either Endobutton or Rigidfix respectively. Prior to surgery and then at least 2 years after surgery, the patients were under physical examination in terms of knee range of motion, knee stability, knee pain, ability to perform daily activities and exercises and compared between the two groups.Results:The knee range of motion in Endbutton and Rigidfix were 135.73±2.63 and 129.87±7.14 degrees resprectively (P=0.06). In comparison of the two groups, during last month in Endobutton and Rigidfixthe frequency of knee pain were 2.5±1.4 and 3.4±1.4respectively (P=0.08). Moreover, the pain intensity score were 2.9±1.5 and 2.6±1.1 (P=0.49). But there was a significant difference observed in Patients satisfaction and ability to perform sports activities in both groups.Conclusions:In summary, the results of this study showed that the two discussed fixation methods namely Endobutton and Rigidfix are not preferred over one another. ButPatients satisfaction and ability to perform sports activities inEndobutton was better than the Rigidfix.
|
| Descriptor
|
:
|
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
|
|
|
:
|
Knee
|
|
|
:
|
Tendons
|
|
|
:
|
Femoral Fractures
|
| Added Entry
|
:
|
Mousavi, Hamid, Thesis advisor
|
| Translated Title Supplied by Cataloguer
|
:
|
مقایسه نتایج درمانی بازسازی رباط صلیبی قدامی به دو روش ریجید فیکس و اندوباتون در بیماران ۲۰ تا ۴۵ ساله مراجعه کننده به مراکز درمانی شهر اصفهان
|
| |