| |
| center
|
:
|
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
|
| Document Type
|
:
|
Latin Dissertation
|
| Language of Document
|
:
|
English
|
| Record Number
|
:
|
106373
|
| Doc. No
|
:
|
T16480
|
| Call number
|
:
|
WC255,S125e,2015
|
| Main Entry
|
:
|
Sadeghi Panah, Fatemeh
|
| Title & Author
|
:
|
Effects of irrigation with different solution on Incidence of Wound Infection\ Fatemeh Sadeghi Panah
|
| College
|
:
|
Schools, Medical
|
| Date
|
:
|
, 2015
|
| Degree
|
:
|
Speciality
|
| field of study
|
:
|
Emergency medicine
|
| Page No
|
:
|
No paging.: diag, tab
|
| Note
|
:
|
This is a research dissertation with project ID:392302
|
| Abstract
|
:
|
Introduction: Management of acute andchronic wounds has significantly altered inthe last decade but little attention has beenpaid to the solution used for cleansing thewounds. Therefore, the present study aimedto compare the effects of tap water, distilledwater, and normal saline for woundcleansing in emergency department.Methods: This is a double-blind randomizedclinical trial with a 10-day follow up.Patients who had superficial wounds wererandomly divided into 3 treatment groups:normal saline, distilled water, and tap water.The wounds were cleansed using a 20 - 60milliliter syringe with an 18 gauge needle.All the patients were discharged with thesame antibiotic and were followed 48 hoursand 10-day to determine the presence orabsence of infection symptoms. Theevaluated outcomes were infection incidencein the first 48 hours and 10 days after beingdischarged.Results: 1200 patients were included in thepresent study (57% male, average age 25.5 ±11.0 years). 43 (3.5%) patients showedinfection symptoms in the first 48 hours.Ten (2.5%) patients were in normal salinetreated group, 15 (3.7%) patients were indistilled water group, and 18 (4.4%) patientswere in tap water treated group (p=0.32). 13(3.2%) patients in normal saline group, 20(4.9%) patients in distilled water group and23 (5.6%) in the tap water group did not taketheir antibiotics. Prevalence of infectionwere higher in patients who did not takeantibiotics (p < 0.001). The 10-day followuprevealed that all the patients wererecovered and showed no infectionsymptoms.Conclusion: The results of the present studyshowed that the prevalence of infection inusing the 3 agents (normal saline, distilledwater and tap water) for cleansing woundswas similar. Therefore, drinking water couldbe considered as an alternative for cleansingwounds.
|
| Descriptor
|
:
|
Wound Infection
|
|
|
:
|
Sodium Chloride
|
|
|
:
|
Anti-Bacterial Agents
|
|
|
:
|
Emergency Medicine
|
| Added Entry
|
:
|
Zamani, Majid, Thesis advisor
|
|
|
:
|
Azizkhani, Reza, Consulting advisor
|
| Translated Title Supplied by Cataloguer
|
:
|
بررسی مقایسه ای بروز عفونت زخم در سه گروه از بیماران تحت شستشوی زخم با سرم شستشو، آب مقطر و آب معمولی در مراجعه به اورژانس بیمارستان الزهرا در سال1392-1393
|
| | | | | |
| | |  |
http://elib.mui.ac.ir/site/catalogue/106373
| | | |
| | | |
|